Both sides caution there isn’t a final deal yet, but an agreement appears to be in the works for a two-year budget that would avoid another damaging government shutdownand replace half the sequester cuts poised to fall on the Pentagon and domestic programs.
The process is still fluid with lots of moving parts, but negotiators are working toward a House floor vote that would meet the deadline of Friday, Dec. 13, when the House adjourns for the holidays. “Things are headed in a good direction,” says a Senate budget aide. “It’s not a done deal yet, but there’s a sense it can get done in the next few days.”
It’s news in Washington when lawmakers actually accomplish a task after so much partisan gridlock, and everyone cautions things could yet fall apart. If the agreement holds, credit goes to House and Senate budget committee chairs, Rep. Paul Ryan and Sen. Patty Murray, for quiet perseverance in finding common ground, and to the general exhaustion of lawmakers in both parties who didn’t want to put themselves, and the country, through the wringer again over the budget.
The potential deal, as described by aides on background, comes in at around $1 trillion, a compromise between the GOP’s $967 billion and the Senate Democrats’ $1.058 trillion. It would eliminate about half of the $91 billion in sequester cuts that would otherwise kick in on Jan. 15 by finding savings and new revenue that can get around the GOP’s refusal to raise taxes. “This is a deal many Democrats will be happy with,” says a Democratic aide. “The sequester is such a big problem for families with kids in Head Start and for medical research, and we know it’s hurt the economy. [Sen. Murray] would have loved to replace the whole thing. If it comes together, it replaces as much of the sequester as possible, as much as the Republicans would allow.”
At a press conference Thursday in the Capitol, Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and other Democrats pushed back against some of the rumored components of the emerging framework. The notion that federal workers are singled out to contribute more to their pensions, in the absence of a bigger deal that would spread the pain among more Americans, elicited stinging criticism from Maryland Reps. Steny Hoyer and Chris Van Hollen, who represent a lot of government workers. “Why are we asking them to pay something when we’re not asking the owners of corporate jets to take some of their subsidy?” asked Van Hollen. “They’re always going after the little guy and not letting the big guy contribute,” he continued, pointing out that another aspect of the deal that’s being floated would raise airport fees on the traveling public.
Whether the agreement as it’s being crafted can pass the House is the next big hurdle. Can Ryan and Murray find the sweet spot that will attract enough Republicans without alienating Democrats?
More articles from The Daily Beast:
- Freed Taliban Prisoners in Pakistan and Afghanistan Return to Jihad
- Inside the ‘PayPal 14’ Trial
- Don’t Sanitize Nelson Mandela: He’s Honored Now, But Was Hated Then
© 2013 Newsweek/Daily Beast Company LLC